The problem is the lack of itrafmonion, both about the financial status of the investor companies and about the construction status of the buildings. Interlink (WtP';s investor) are hiding itrafmonion from their buyers no one is willing to present the construction papers to the apartment buyers, nor willing to admit that this development might be a mistake (financial and marketing miscalculation of budget of the builder). IF you look carefully at your preliminary agreements, you will see that the seller is obliged to present itrafmonion about the progress of the construction. So far, nobody can make the sellers present this itrafmonion. I wonder, why they hide it so desperately?Regarding the inquiries of those of you, who wonder what to do, I can only advise you to measure the risk yourself. I second my opinion, that each of you should decide what actions should undertake. I don';t have itrafmonion about the financial status of the sellers, nor I have the documents about the construction phase.The latter can be obtained only in court procedure with or without the seller';s consent. Having in mind the above, I can';t estimate whether you can get your money in full after you win the case. It only depends on the financial status of the debtor (the seller) at the time when the court resolution is issued.As for the comment above that it';s better not to have a title deed, I have to oppose that. My advise is to obtain the title deed this way you will become an owner. Otherwise you will be a possessor of a plain paper with rights that cannot be executed (if the company has no funds after you win the lawsuit) http://ryywgj.com [url=http://vxqvctkft.com]vxqvctkft[/url] [link=http://roazopwrwj.com]roazopwrwj[/link]

Dawn O';Shea I am one of a number of Irish, British and Russian owerns of private apartments in a complex in Sunny Beach. The developer of the complex now owns the middle block of apartments and claims to have a 54% share of the vote at the GM and hence the rest of us are out-voted on everything. At present he has succeeded in electing himself manager of the complex, his management company has been awarded the management contract, his maintenance company has been awarded the maintenance contract. We are paying double the maintenance fee paid by other similar complexes and the cost of bar staff, restaruant overheads etc has been factored into our maintenance fee because he has voted it in. Is there any way that we can create a more level playing field in terms of voting power and appointment of manager? Any advice would be much appreciated.